Eyes of

the World

AFFILIATED PRESS INTERNATIONAL

Affiliated Press Eurozone - The Newspaper Group's on-line Edition

'Eyes of the World'

affiliated news

A human rights group has accused Vladimir Putin of presiding over Russia's worst political crackdown since the fall of the Soviet Union.

New York-based Human Rights Watch has warned the nation has been experiencing the most severe repression of civil liberties in its post-Soviet history.

Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director for the organisation, said: 'This has been the worst year for human rights in Russia in recent memory. 'The Kremlin in 2012 unleashed the worst political crackdown in Russia's post-Soviet history.

'Measures to intimidate critics and restrict Russia's vibrant civil society have reached unprecedented levels. Pressure and reprisals against activists and non-governmental organisations need to stop.'

He cited a series of laws passed since Mr Putin's return to power last year, which have included new powers to limit public assembly, increase fines for protesters, restrict access to the internet and recriminalise libel.

The matter is really a question about foreigners and how foreigners are persuaded to adopt British customs and styles. Including the ability to speak the English language. Something that countless immigrants have failed to even address - or have even bothered to learn.

England cricket captain Nasser Hussain - who was born in India - is a perfect example of racial integration. And, integration and learning what it means to be British, is where the breakdown is.

John Majors once said, that in 50 years time, it would still be the country of "long shadows on county grounds, warm beer, invincible green suburbs, dog lovers and pool fillers or, - as George Orwell also said, 'old maids bicycling to holy communion through the morning mist'." This is total poppycock and such things will be the reserve of places like the Cotswolds and Cumbria, but certainly not London. London belongs to eveyone... but the British. 

David Blunkett may be blind, but when he mentioned that forced marriages and genital mutilation were certainly not part of Britishness, he was so damn right.

My Query: If these pictures, were found on a man’s lap top, would he then be arrested for having porn and contributing to child abuse?

Hang on: There's a collect call from Henry James from his Gaol cell. He says he's looking for his next celestial wife and might have just found her.

Thylane Loubry Blondeau, a 10-year-old, after posing as a sexy couture model for French Vogue has reignited the debate over the sexualization of young girls. The photos of the Parisian preteen, whose lanky body and 'sexy-model' pout looks very similar to an adult magazine cover. Will they not let them grow up first?

Just 10 years old and already Thylane Lena-Rose Blondeau is filling some very adult shoes in her Vogue Paris fashion spread. How young is TOO young to rock high heels, red lipstick and suggestive poses?

Controversy rages about the line that should be drawn.

EU-french-model3

It is easy to see that this model is quite a bit younger than a teen, so I'm thinking Vogue is just looking to peek interest and controversy to sell more magazines. Keeping their name out front. However, 'Toddlers and Tiaras' is no better. They are just little girls, so there is a limit - what on earth do they need a swimsuit event for? That may be stretching the matter.

EU-french-model

PARIS:

Letters received

What a sad, 'sexploited' little girl. Not one of the pictures shows her smiling. Her parents are irresponsible opportunists who have stolen her childhood to feed their self-interest.This is no different than child porn. Jean T.

This represents what the world has become. Get used to it. Children call the shots today. They know what they want. This girl's parents are merely setting her up for the future and other children out there will want the same. Smart marketing. Claire S.

Never shy of the Media spotlight, Ms Amiel once gave an interview to Vogue magazine from her sumptuous London mansion, and while displaying her over abundance of closets swelling at the seams with furs, evening gowns, jewellery - diamonds and pearls - along with every conceivable luxurious brand name item known to the ilk of Paris Hilton and her groupie list of heiress confidants, while exclaiming to the awestruck interviewer that her"extravagance knows no bounds." Co-incidentally, when this interview hit the airwaves, Hollinger International (Lord Black's beleagured holding company for his massive media interests) along with it's group of investors, decided to begin legal action in Illinois against Lord and Lady Black, seeking $1.25 billion in damages. Caught with their hand in the 'cookie jar' in other words!

Archived Articles - Anne Hunt

If you think Mr Rapture - his name for his cult - is not a politician, then think again. God only knows how Harold picked the  21st of May to be the end of the world, because it's not the first time this owner of 66 Radio stations and countless followers in the US has got Armageddon  totally ass-up. Serial Predictors usually know how to count - well up to a few million bucks, at the very least. Harold now tells us, like many other politicians, he's quite lousy at maths and his calculations really meant the 21st of October.

Okay, so Harold and Gordon Brown have common ground. I suppose it's not the first time in history someone can be five months out. When F. Scott Fitzgerald was creating another work of genious - aided and abetted by Johnnie Walker - he often lost track of a few months. Then again Scott was not an advocate of the, 'There's one born every minute' philosophy.

Sad part is, that while Harold was camping about with jiggling numbers, his 'loyal' followers had already given away their wordly goods and headed for the sea armed with nothing but the raptuous gleam in their eyes and the hope of a L. Ron Hubbard style trip to their galaxy.

Live by the Sword

Die by the Sword

Bin Laden's combative life catches up with him!

 For the most discerning shopper

bin ladenthumb

An impassioned manhunt that had stretched close to a decade finally ended with the locating and killing of the World's most wanted man, Osama bin Laden. It was assumed that he was hiding out in a desert cave, when all along, he was 'holed up' in a million dollar home 60 miles north of Islamabad, Pakistan.

He was obliterated during a fierce shootout with American Special Forces allowing the US to finally rejoice and lay to rest the lives of those innocents who were killed during bin Laden's masterminded 9/11 attack on the World Trade Centre towers in New York. No amount of vengeful killing and destruction will bring those lives back, in fact, the killing of any despot is always a hollow victory, however, evil of that magnitude could not go unpunished. There undoubtedly will be repercussions over his death. We may never know the depth of Pakistan's Intelligence Services complicity in his 'secret hideaway.

He has a long list of supporters willing to take up arms and die for 'the cause.' Bin Laden himself said he would go down fighting, and so he has. The gun battle raid which lasted a mere 40 minutes was well executed and planned so that there would be little chance of bin Laden eluding his fate yet again. It does beg the question, however.

With the Billions of US dollars going into the Pakistani government's coffers every year in support of the Global assault on terrorism, why did Osama's where abouts stay a hidden secret from Pakistani authorities for so long??

Were they indeed hanging onto such knowledge for fear that once caught, the money pot would then dry up? By their latest condemnation of what they call an 'unlawful killing,' Pakistan may find itself a little short of a few billion come USA aid time.

Seemingly, the Pakistani Government had forgotten the deal the Bush  Administration had with them in November 2008 that allowed unmanned Predator aircraft to attack suspected terrorist targets in North West Pakistan, precisely the area where Bin Laden was holed up. In fact, there had been a number of incidents where US Commandos had carried our helicopter raids in that area. It was an unwritten rule that had been in force and used ever since.

If the Taliban had not attacked the Pakistan Training Facility and killed 80 - something that could not have been anticipated, this matter would have been passed over. Now the Pakistani Parliament have taken the step of threatening the USA, that 'unless' they stop 'Predator' patrols over their territory, the USA  will no longer be able to have convoys supply their troops in Afghanistan, using Pakistan  as a route. Brinkmanship or serious? Both Nations have much to lose.